|
|
||
By Jeffrey H. Waugh | Publication Date: Monday, 26 January 2009
The LSS is taking a neutral stance, says Adam Picotte, vice
president (academic) for the society. “What we’re trying to do is
facilitate an honest and academic debate on the issue,” he says.
“One
of the criticisms that a lot of the students have had is that a lot of
schools have just been going forward with this, and it’s been a
swelling wave as opposed to a thought-out position.”
The debate, scheduled to take place on Jan. 29, will involve two students and two local practitioners. Picotte says the debaters will be trying to show the pros and cons of each side, so students can be fully informed. It will be followed by a plebiscite in early February.
The
results will dictate how the LSS moves forward. If there’s a strong
indication of a desire for change, Picotte says the LSS will bring the
issue to faculty counsel.
For the complete article see:
http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/Dal-debates-JD-designation.html
Richardson - LSAT - GMAT - GRE - MCAT Prepartion Courses - Toronto, Canada

